Last ned (Gratis)

Abstrakt

We propose an electronic voting system where multiple independent
parties cooperate to register the voter, acquire the ballots, and count the
election result using multiparty computations. The aim of this system
is to guarantee privacy of the voter and the ballot, public verifiability,
and robustness against malicious authorities. The system is flexible in
the sense that it is not bound to a single set of election rules, or public
key cryptosystem.

Referanser

D. Sandler and D. Wallach: Casting Votes in the Auditorium. EVT’07: Pro-
ceedings of the USENIX Workshop on Accurate Electronic Voting Technology,
USENIX Association, (2007)
The Norwegian Information Security Conference (NISK) 2009 145
[2] M. Ben-Or, S. Goldwasser, and A. Wigderson: Completeness Theorems for Non-
Cryptographic Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computation. Proceedings of the eighth
annual ACM Symposium on Principles of distributed computing. Pages: 201 -
209, ISBN:0-89791-326-4, (1989)
[3] Web: http://www.gnu.org/software/free/. Access Date: September, (2009)
[4] Web: http://www.adderpit.com/˜sjaveed/coding/votebot.html. Access Date:
September, (2009)
[5] Web: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/elections/pilots. Access Date:
September, (2009)
[6] Web: http://www.foruminternet.org/telechargement/documents/reco-evote-en-
20030926.pdf. Access Date: September, (2009)
[7] European University Institute, Robert Schuman center for Advanced Studies,
Report for the Council of Europe: Internet Voting in the March 2007
Parliamentary Elections in Estonia. July 31, (2007)
[8] Norwegian Ministry of Local Government and regional Development: Report:
Electronic voting- challenges and opportunities. February, (2006)
[9] T. Tjøstheim, T. Peacock, and P.Y. A. Ryan: A model for system-based analysis
of voting systems. Fifteenth International Workshop on Security Protocols,
(2007)
[10] K. R. Iversen: The Application of Cryptographic Zero-Knowledge Techniques
in Computerized Secret Ballot Election Schemes. Ph.D. dissertation, IDT-report,
1991:3, Norweigan Institute of Technology, February, (1991)
[11] D. Chaum, J. Graaf, P. Ryan, P. Vora: High Integrity Elections. Cryptology
ePrint Archive, Report 2007/270. http://eprint.iacr.org/, (2007)
[12] J. Bohli, J. Muller-Quade, and S. Rohrich: Bingo Voting: Secure and coercionfree
voting using a trusted random number generator, Cryptology ePrint Archive,
Report 2007/162. http://eprint.iacr.org/, (2007)
[13] J. Graaf, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: Merging Pret-a-
Voter and PunchScan, Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2007/269.
http://eprint.iacr.org/, (2007)
[14] A. Acquisti: Receipt-free homomorphic elections and write-in ballots. Cryptol-
ogy ePrint Archive, Report 2004/105. http://eprint.iacr.org/, (2004)
[15] R. Aditya, B. Lee, C. Boyd, and E. Dawson: An efficient mixnet-based voting
scheme providing receipt-freeness. In Sokratis K. Katsikas, Javier Lopez, and
Gunther Pernul, editors, TrustBus, volume 3184 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Pages 152-161. Springer, (2004)
[16] C. Bouras, N. Katris, V. Triantafillou: An electronic voting service to support
decision-making in local government, Telematics and Informatics 20 (2003) 255-
274, February 12, (2003)
146 The Norwegian Information Security Conference (NISK) 2009
[17] O. Baudron, P.-A. Fouque, D. Pointcheval, G. Poupard and J. Stern Practical
Multi-Candidate Election System Proceeding of the 20th ACM Symposium on
Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC ’01) Pages: 274-283, ACM Press,
(2001)
[18] The Virtual Ideal Functionality Framework (VIFF) Web: http://viff.dk/.



Forrige artikkel      Neste artikkel